Skip to main content

October Frights Blog Hop Day 4

 HORROR'S DIMINISHING RETURNS & THE FUTURE OF FRIGHT


 

"It's more instructive, perhaps, to look into the reason why the morbid has been changed into the unintentionally mirthful. Much as we dislike to consider it, one answer keeps cropping up: Hollywood no longer knows what horror is."

If you've been to the movies lately, you most likely will agree with that statement. But here's the kicker: that quote comes from an interview with Robert Bloch. In 1960.

His words ring as true today as they did then, and I would submit that it applies not just to movies, but all forms of entertainment. And it's a wake-up call for us writers and "old folks" (over 30!). Our dismay with today's movies, books, and television has as much to do with our status as an older generation as it does Hollywood's continued descent into mediocrity. Not that said descent hasn't happened, it's just not something we understood until we grew experienced enough to recognize it.

In that interview, which first ran in Rogue Magazine, Bloch also says: "Just as Halloween, with its ghosts and goblins, has been transformed into a sub-teen Thanksgiving with Tricks-or-Treats replacing the turkey, so has the horror movie suffered a sea-change into something strictly for laffs, with genuine grue and imagination replaced by a vat of ketchup and a false face that wouldn't frighten a timid two-year-old. The shudder salesmen have sold out and the average horror flick nowadays evokes more gaiety than goose-pimples."

 Send us your questions for Robert Englund, AKA Freddy Krueger | Movies |  The Guardian

 

 

Bloch goes on to place the blame for this on various sources: censorship, the growing horrors detailed in the nightly news and newspapers, and a shift from the things that cause true terror to things that merely entertain.

And in a way, that trend continues today, although the specifics for the causes might be different.

Bloch cites Godzilla and giant bug movies as concepts that should have been frightening but weren't, because the scale was too large. By shifting from claustrophobic horror – the Wolf-Man on the moors, Dracula in his castle, Jack the Ripper on a foggy street, the Mummy silently approaching from behind an unsuspecting victim – to something that causes thousands or millions of deaths, the personal aspect is lost on the viewer. The sheer scale of death renders the fear factor impotent. I believe that if Bloch were alive today, he'd recognize GODZILLA as perhaps the precursor to "summer blockbuster" movies, which may arouse excitement or tension but never fear. GODZILLA, TRANSFORMERS, even VAN HELSING, none of them were designed to put a chill into the viewer. 

King of the Monsters: Godzilla Is the Ultimate Paradox - The Atlantic


Bloch lists what he considers the most frightening of themes: things lurking in the darkness, the stranger among us, deformity, insanity, deadly animals, the unknown or unexpected. He then condemns Hollywood for forgetting the meaning of fear and either focusing too much on special effects, cheap scares, or comical take-offs. He mentions monsters meeting Abbott & Costello and the Bowery Boys, sequels that drain the life from their progenitors, and the mutant bug movies of the 1950s as examples of non-horror.

I wonder what he would think of today's movies? Films like SAW or HOSTEL, which substitute gore for good writing and truly suspenseful situations. In 1960, Hollywood hadn't yet delivered such "classic" films as BLOOD FEAST, TWO THOUSAND MANIACS, BLOOD SUCKING FREAKS, I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE, or THE HILLS HAVE EYES. Would Bloch have added splatter-horror (or torture porn) to his list of cinematic downfalls? What would he have thought of franchises such as NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET or HALLOWEEN, with their mix of comic relief and gruesome murders?

I think he would have rebelled against all of them, save for a few with actual chilling moments (NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD, ROSEMARY'S BABY, THE SENTINEL, etc.).

And on the subject of remakes and sequels, he states: "After 30 years of repetition and burlesque, it is hardly probable that an audience can view the original FRANKENSTEIN and recapture its initial impact."

But I also believe Bloch fails to consider one important fact: as the world changes, so do the imaginations and attention spans of the movie-going audience. Take his FRANKENSTEIN example. A child today, even if he or she has never seen any of the monster's film incarnations, would not be enraptured by seeing the original. It moves too slowly for a brain that is wired differently than the brains of people growing up in the 1930s. Today's tweens, teens, and new adults crave rapid action and fast-paced editing. They've been trained to capture information in that way. 

She Created a Monster : Language Lounge : Thinkmap Visual Thesaurus

What does this mean for horror movies – and for books, television, and comics as well? It means that we, as the writers, the artists, the producers, must find ways to capture true fear, the fear of the mysterious, the unknown, the unseen, in ways that really frighten our audiences. We need to give them what they crave without falling into the trap of relying solely on grue or sardonic comedy or action sequences. Not that there isn't a place for them, but let's be honest. They are not "horror."

People crave true frights. They want to jump in their seats, be afraid to turn the lights off when they go home, feel their hearts pounding when they hear that unfamiliar noise, thanks to seeing a movie or reading a book. They want more than to just walk out of the theater laughing at the creature's foolish appearance, complaining about the predictable ending, or going on about how the maniac managed to find so many idiots for his traps.

They want to be scared, dammit.

And I love that it's my job to do it.

 

 JG Faherty - Creator of Dark Fiction 🎃 (@JGFaherty) / Twitter

 =============================================================

 Stay tuned for tomorrow's creepy entry and be sure to check out everyone else on the blog hop!

 
 

 

 As always, be sure to check out  A.F. Stewart's October Frights blog page, https://afstewart.ca/october-frights-blog-hop-participants/, for the links to all the different bloggers and the latest about the blog hop and all things horror. While there, be sure to visit the Book Showcase Page (https://afstewart.ca/october-frights-book-fair/) where all the participants have made their terrifying books available for purchase (most are on sale, including my novel CARNIVAL OF FEAR, which is only 99cents for Kindle!). And don't forget about the free book giveaway page: https://storyoriginapp.com/to/oyHMogF.



 



 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Friends Unseen

 Catherine Cavendish is the author of  several novels and novellas, including The Devil's Serenade, Dark Avenging Angel, Saving Grace Devine, and The Pendle Curse. Today she's here to talk about some rather unsettling imaginary friends. When you were growing up, did you have an imaginary friend? Did they seem real to you? Maybe sort-of-real. You could talk to them, imagine their responses, play with them - but you probably kept the ‘relationship’ within certain boundaries, however young you were. In my case, I invented an entire family of siblings – three sisters (two older, one a few years younger) and an older brother who looked out for us girls. Being an only child, I found them comforting, and fun, but I never imagined them to be real. They, in turn, kept themselves firmly lodged in my own mind and never attempted to cross any boundary into the real world. In my novel, The Devil’s Serenade, my central character also had an imaginary family when she was a chil...

VAMPIRES: LOVE & VIOLENCE - guest blog by Nancy Kilpatrick

VAMPIRES: LOVE & VIOLENCE Nancy Kilpatrick  Today's blog features a special guest appearance by acclaimed author and editor, Nancy Kilpatrick, who's written more than 20 novels in the horror, supernatural, and paranormal genres, edited 15 anthologies, and been recognized by Fangoria as "Canada's answer to Anne Rice."  She's best known for her vampire novels and short stories, including her latest, Savagery of the Rebel King , which comes out this month. I've been a fan of hers for a long time, and I'm more than happy to have her with us today talking about those sexy, scary creatures of the night, vampires !  **************   I've written and read way more vampire books than any mortal likely should.  The Undead have always fascinated me. They look like us, and now the modern vampire (unlike their dirtier grave-dwelling ancestors) smells like us. They sit at the next table at chic eateries and on one of the plastic seats at ...

Hark! The Herald Angels Scream - a review

So, I recently finished reading the holiday-themed horror anthology Hark! The Herald Angels Scream , edited by Christopher Golden and published through Blumhouse Books. As you can probably deduce, the antho's theme is holiday-oriented stories. Some involve Christmas, some Yule, and some just the general winter season of December. All of them have a dark core, and the stories range from outright horror scares to subtle suspense, with more than a few falling in the 'weird fiction' category. The TOC includes some of the genre's biggest names (Joe R. Lansdale, Sarah Pinborough, Jonathan Maberry, Kelley Armstrong, Josh Malerman) along with several acclaimed authors who aren't in the public eye but should be. My favorites in the anthology are "Mistletoe and Holly" by James A. Moore (a gleefully twisted take on the old adage of be careful what you wish for), "Love Me" by Thomas E. Sniegoski (a poignant example of how trying to do the right thing...